How Access To Capital Helps Filipino Nano And Microentrepreneurs Turn Diskarte Into Sustainable Livelihoods

Access to working capital helps Filipino nano and microentrepreneurs turn diskarte into steadier income, stronger families, and sustainable livelihoods.

Home Buddies: How A Home Community Redefined The Way Filipinos Live, Share, And Belong

Home Buddies has grown beyond decorating tips, creating a space where Filipinos exchange practical knowledge, personal stories, and meaningful ideas about home.

NephroPlus Philippines Expands Kidney Health Advocacy Through “Kaagapay Sa Kalusugan Ng Bato” Initiative

NephroPlus Philippines expands “Kaagapay sa Kalusugan ng Bato” to bring kidney health education closer to more Filipino communities.

Rudy Project Philippines Announces Its Biggest End Of Season Sale

Rudy Project Philippines closes the season with its biggest sale, giving customers up to 60% off selected performance gear.

QC Court Junks Garin Plea To Dismiss Damage Raps Over Dengvaxia

QC Court Junks Garin Plea To Dismiss Damage Raps Over Dengvaxia

65
65

How do you feel about this story?

Express Your Reaction
Like
Love
Haha
Wow
Sad
Angry

The Quezon City Regional Trial Court (RTC) has turned down former Health Secretary and now Iloilo 1st District Rep. Janette Garin’s plea seeking the dismissal of a damage suit arising from the Dengvaxia vaccine controversy.

In a four-page order dated January 31 and made public, RTC Branch 230 Judge Maria Gilda T. Loja-Pangili denied the motion to dismiss filed by Garin in the civil suit filed by Ian L. Colite, the father of a school child who died in 2017 shortly after receiving two doses of the Dengvaxia vaccine.

The court said it “finds the allegations in the complaint (against Garin) sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and the defendant’s (Garin) averments as merely directed to the veracity and correctness of the allegations found therein”.

“(I)t is incumbent upon the Court to deny the instant motion to dismiss and proceed to trial to prove the defense of herein defendant, Thus, this Court should still proceed with the determination of the principal action so that an adjudication of the rights of the parties can be had,” the court said.

Garin’s lawyers had argued that the court has no jurisdiction given that none of the parties reside in the city.

Ruling otherwise, the court said it was the prerogative of the plaintiff to choose the venue of the suit and cited that at least one of the other defendants has residence within the jurisdiction of the court.

The court gave Garin 15 days to comment on the civil suit. (PNA)